President Kenyatta Lambasts Western Powers As Dogged
With Political Realism, Double Standards And Politicization Of International
Law. Western nations which perpetrated or did nothing to stop economic exploitation
and political oppression of Africans have no moral authority to question everything
that Africans do. Indeed it is ridiculous for them to continue telling Africa what
to do and how to do it when they themselves have their own problems.
Speech
By His Excellency Hon. Uhuru Kenyatta, C.G.H., President and commander In Chief
Of The Defense Forces Of The Republic Of Kenya At The extraordinary Session Of
The Assembly Of Heads Of State And Government Of the African Union, Addis
Ababa, Ethiopia,12th October, 2013.
Chair of the African Union, Prime
Minister Hailemariam Dessalegn,Chair of the Commission of the African Union, Dr
Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma,Colleagues Head of State and Government, Distinguished
Ladies and Gentlemen, It gives me special pleasure to join your Excellencies at
this Special Summit, where we have assembled to reflect on very significant
matters relating to the welfare and destiny of our nations and peoples.
I thank you for the honor of addressing
you today, because as it happens, I crave my brother and sister Excellencies'
views on some issues. We are privileged to lead the nations of a continent on
the rise. Africa rests at the centre of global focus as the continent of the
future. Although we have been relentlessly exploited in the past, we remain
with sufficient resources to invest in a prosperous future. Whilst we have been
divided and incited against one another before, we are now united and more
peaceful.
Even as we grapple with a few regional
conflicts, as Africans, we are taking proactive measures to ensure that all our
people move together in the journey to prosperity in a peaceful home. Even
though we were dominated and controlled by imperialists and colonial interests
in years gone by, we are now proud, independent and sovereign nations and
people. We are looking to the future with hope, marching towards the horizon
with confidence and working in unity. This is the self-evident promise that
Africa holds for its people today.
As leaders, we are the heirs of freedom
fighters, and our founding fathers. These liberation heroes founded the Organization
of African Unity, which was dedicated to the eradication of ALL FORMS OF
COLONIALSM. Towards this end, the OAU defended the interests of independent
nations and helped the cause of those that were still colonized. It sought to
prevent member states from being controlled once again by outsider powers. The
founding fathers of African Unity were conscious that structural colonialism
takes many forms, some blatant and extreme, like apartheid, while others are
subtler and deceptively innocuous, like some forms of development
assistance.
It has been necessary, therefore, for
African leaders to constantly watch out against threats to our peoples
'sovereignty and unity. In our generation, we have honored our fathers'
legacies by guaranteeing that through the African Union, our countries and our
people shall achieve greater unity, and that the sovereignty, territorial
integrity and independence of our States shall not be trifled with. More than
ever, our destiny is in our hands. Yet at the same time, more than ever, it is
imperative for us to be vigilant against the persistent machinations of
outsiders who desire to control that destiny. We know what this does to our
nations and people: subjugation and suffering. Your Excellencies, The
philosophies, ideologies, structures and institutions that visited misery upon
millions for centuries ultimately harm their perpetrators. Thus the imperial
exploiter crashes into the pits of penury.
The arrogant world police is crippled by
shambolic domestic dysfunction. These are the spectacles of Western decline we
are witnessing today. At the same time, other nations and continents rise and
prosper. Africa and Asia continue to thrive, with their promise growing every
passing day. As our strength multiplies, and our unity gets deeper, those who
want to control and exploit us become more desperate.
Therefore, they abuse whatever power
remains in their control. The Swahili people say that one ascending a ladder
cannot hold hands with one descending. The force of gravity will be compounded
and the one going up only loses. The International Criminal Court was mandated
to accomplish these objectives by bringing to justice those criminal
perpetrators who bear greatest responsibility for crimes. Looking at the world
in the past, at that time and even now, it was clear that there have always
been instances of unconscionable impunity and atrocity that demand a concerted
international response, and that there are vulnerable, helpless victims of
these crimes who require justice as a matter of right. This is the understanding,
and the expectation of most signatories to the Rome Statute.
The most active global powers of the
time declined to ratify the Treaty, or withdrew somewhere along the way, citing
several compelling grounds. The British foreign secretary Robin Cook said at
the time, that the International Criminal Court was not set up to bring to book
Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom or Presidents of the United States. Had
someone other than a Western leader said those fateful words, the word
'impunity' would have been thrown at them with an emphatic alacrity. An
American senator serving on the foreign relations committee echoed the British
sentiments and said, "Our concern is that this is a court that is
irreparably flawed, that is created with an independent prosecutor, with no
checks and balances on his power, answerable to no state institution, and that
this court is going to be used for politicized prosecutions. “The understanding
of the States which subscribed to the Treaty in good faith was two-fold.
First, those world powers were hesitant
to a process that might make them accountable for such spectacularly criminal
international adventures as the wars in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan and
other places, and such hideous enterprises as renditions and torture. Such
states did not, therefore, consider such warnings as applicable to pacific and
friendly parties. Secondly, it was the understanding of good-faith subscribers
that the ICC would administer and secure justice in a fair, impartial and
independent manner and, as an international court, bring accountability to
situations and perpetrators everywhere in the world. As well, it was hoped that
the ICC would set the highest standards of justice and judicial processes.
Your Excellencies, as has been
demonstrated quite thoroughly over the past decade, the good-faith subscribers
had fallen prey to their high-mindedness and idealism. I do not need to tell
your Excellencies about the nightmare my country in particular, and myself and
my Deputy as individuals, have had to endure in making this realization.
Western powers are the key drivers of the ICC process. They have used
prosecutions as ruses and bait to pressure Kenyan leadership into adopting, or
renouncing various positions. Close to 70% of the Court's annual budget is
funded by the European Union. The threat of prosecution usually suffices to
have pliant countries execute policies favorable to these countries. Through
it, regime-changes lights of hand have been attempted in Africa. A number of
them have succeeded. The Office of the Prosecutor made certain categorical
pronouncements regarding eligibility for leadership of candidate’s in Kenya's
last general election. Only a fortnight ago, the Prosecutor proposed
undemocratic and unconstitutional adjustments to the Kenyan Presidency. These
interventions go beyond interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign
State. They constitute a fetid insult to Kenya and Africa.
African sovereignty means nothing to the
ICC and its patrons. They also dovetail altogether too conveniently with the
warnings given to Kenyans just before the last elections: choices have
consequences. This chorus was led by the USA, Britain, EU, and certain eminent
persons in global affairs. It was a threat made to Kenyans against electing my
Government. My Government's decisive election must be seen as a categorical
rebuke by the people of Kenya of those who wished to interfere with our
internal affairs and infringe our sovereignty. Now Kenya has undergone numerous
problems since its birth as a Republic 50 years ago. Yet over the same period,
Kenya has also made tremendous progress. It is the same in all countries of
Africa.
At our Golden Jubilee, we look forward
to a rebirth characterizing the next 50 years, not a ceaseless slackening to
our history. I must make the point that we do not intend to forget, or discount
the value of our history. Rather, we do want to learn from it, not live in it.
As Kenya's President, it gives me a feeling of deep and lasting pride to know
that I can count on the African Union to listen and help in trying times.
Africa has always stood by our side.
When we faced violent disagreements over
the 2007 election result, my distinguished predecessor, Mwai Kibaki came to you
with a request for help, and you did not stint. You instituted a high-level
team of Eminent Persons who came to our assistance. Because of that, we were
able to summon the confidence to speak to each other and agree. As a result, we
put in place a 4-pointplan, which not only put Kenya back on track, but formed
the basis of the most rapid political, legal and social reform ever witnessed
in our country. Through it, we successfully mediated the dispute surrounding
the 2007election and pacified the country. A power-sharing coalition was formed
with a mandate to undertake far-reaching measures to prevent future violent
disputes, entrench the rule of law, prevent abuses of legal power and entrench
equity in our body politic while also securing justice for the victims of the
post-election violence. We enacted a new, progressive constitution which
instituted Devolution of power and resources, strengthened the protection of
fundamental rights, and enhanced institutional and political checks and
balances. It also provided the legal foundation for the national economic
transformation roadmap, Vision2030.
The project of national transformation
presently underway in Kenya was given tremendous impetus by your Excellencies'
needful intervention. On the basis of this constitution we have instituted
legislation and established institutions to realize the people's basic rights,
ensure transparency and accountability and protect the popular sovereignty of
Kenyans. A new Judiciary and electoral commission have ensured that we have
credible elections and dispute resolution.
Your Excellencies, The people of
Ethiopia warn against the deplorable presumption of chopping up meat for a
lion; I cannot teach you your work, nor force you to accept my position. Please
institute a mechanism to empirically verify what I have told you. My part is to
thank you on behalf of the people of Kenya for your help. After the successful
mediation of the post-election controversy in 2008, there was disagreement over
the best way to bring the perpetrators of post-election violence to account and
secure justice for the victims. One proposal was to set up a local tribunal to
try the cases, while another was to refer the matter to the ICC. The Mediator
who had been appointed by your Excellencies referred the matter to the ICC when
the disagreement persisted. On the basis of this referral, the Prosecutor
stated that he had launched investigations which, he claimed, established that
6 persons had committed crimes against humanity. According to the Prosecutor,
your Excellencies, I fall among those men. Your Excellencies, From the
beginning of the cases, I have fully cooperated with the Court in the earnest
expectation that it afforded the best opportunity for me to clear my name. I
have attended court whenever required and complied with every requirement made
of me in connection with my case. Other Kenyans charged before that court has
similarly cooperated fully. The Government has cooperated to the maximum; the
Court itself found that Kenya's Government has fully complied in 33 out of 37
instances, and was only prevented from cooperating 100% by legal and
constitutional constraints.
After my election, we have continued to
fully cooperate. As earlier stated, we see it as the only means to achieve
personal vindication, but also to protect our country from prejudice. As I
address your Excellencies, my deputy is sitting - in person - in that Court.
Proceedings continue revealing the evidence against us to be reckless figments
and fabrications every passing day. I cannot narrate quite accurately the calculated
humiliation and stigma the prosecution has inflicted on us at every turn,
within and outside the proceedings. It is all consistent with a political
agenda, rather than a quest for justice.
For 5 years I have strained to cooperate
fully, and have consistently beseeched the Court to expedite the cases. Yet the
gratuitous libel and prejudice I have encountered at the instance of the
Prosecution seeks to present me as a fugitive from justice who is guilty as
charged. All I have requested as President is to be allowed to execute my
constitutional obligations as the forensic side of things is handled by my
lawyers. Even as we maintain our innocence, it has always been my position,
shared by my deputy, that the events of 2007 represented the worst embarrassment
to us as a nation, and a shock to our self-belief. We almost commenced the
rapid descent down the precipitous slope of destruction and anarchy. Its
aftermath was similarly an unbearable shame. We are a people who properly take
pride in our achievements and our journey as a nation. The fact that over that
time we had lost direction, however briefly, was traumatizing.
That is the genesis of our rebirth.
Until our ascension to the Presidency of Kenya, thousands of
internally-displaced persons remained in camps. It is generally difficult to
resettle many people owing to scarcity of land and sensitivity to their
preference. But we have undertaken to ensure that no Kenyan will be left behind
in our journey to progress. Resettling the IDP therefore was a particularly
urgent assignment for us. Within 6months of assuming office, we resettled all
of them, and closed the displacement camps for good. Our efforts at pacifying
the main protagonists in the PEV have similarly borne fruit. So much so, that
their conciliation efforts gave birth to a successful political movement which
won the last general election. This not only speaks to the success of
reconciliation, but also testifies to its popular endorsement by the majority
of the people of Kenya. We certainly do not bear responsibility at any level
for the post-election violence of 2007, but as leaders, we felt it incumbent
upon us to bear responsibility for reconciliation and leadership of peace. Our
Government wants to lead Kenya to prosperity founded on national stability and
security. Peace is indispensable to this aspiration. Reconciliation therefore
was not merely good politics; it is key to everything we want to achieve as a
Government.
Your Excellencies, America and Britain
do not have to worry about accountability for international crimes. Although
certain norms of international law are deemed peremptory, this only applies to
non-Western states. Otherwise, they are inert. It is this double standard and
the overt politicization of the ICC that should be of concern to us here today.
It is the fact that this court performs on the cue of European and American
governments against the sovereignty of African States and peoples that should
outrageous. People have termed this situation "race-hunting". I find
great difficulty adjudging them wrong. What is the fate of International
Justice? I dare say that it has lost support owing to the subversive
machinations of its key proponents. Cynicism has no place in justice. Yet it
takes no mean amount of selfish and malevolent calculation to mutate a quest
for accountability on the basis of truth, into a hunger for dramatic sacrifices
to advance geopolitical ends.
The ICC has been reduced into a
painfully farcical pantomime, a travesty that adds insult to the injury of
victims. It stopped being the home of justice the day it became the toy of
declining imperial powers. This is the circumstance which today compels us to
agree with the reasons US, China, Israel, India and other non-signatory States
hold for abstaining from the Rome Treaty. In particular, the very accurate
observations of John R Bolton who said, "For numerous reasons, the United
States decided that the ICC had unacceptable consequences for our national
sovereignty. Specifically, the ICC is an organization that runs contrary to
fundamental American precepts and basic constitutional principles of popular
sovereignty, checks and balances and national independence." Our mandate
as AU and as individual African States is to protect our own and each other's
independence and sovereignty.
The USA and other nations abstained out
of fear. Our misgivings are born of bitter experience. Africa is not a
third-rate territory of second-class peoples. We are not a project, or
experiment of outsiders. It was always impossible for us to uncritically internalize
notions of justice implanted through that most unjust of institutions:
colonialism. The West sees no irony in preaching justice to a people they have
disenfranchised, exploited, taxed and brutalized. Our history serves us well:
we must distrust the blandishments of those who have drunk out of the poisoned
fountain of imperialism.
The spirit of African pride and
sovereignty has withstood centuries of severe tribulation. I invoke that spirit
of freedom and unity today before you. It is a spirit with a voice that rings
through all generations of human history. It is the eternal voice of a majestic
spirit which will never die.
Kenya is striving mightily, and wants to
work with its neighbors and friends everywhere to attain a better home, region
and world. Kenya seeks to be treated with dignity as a proud member of the
community of nations which has contributed immensely, with limited resources,
to the achievement of peace, security and multilateralism. Kenya looks to her
friends in time of need. We come to you to vindicate our independence and
sovereignty. Our unity is not a lie. The African Union is not an illusion. The
philosophy of divide-and rule, which worked against us all those years before,
cannot shackle us to the ground in our Season of Renaissance. Our individual
and collective sovereignty requires us to take charge of our destiny, and fashion
African solutions to African problems.
It will be disingenuous, Excellencies,
to pretend that there is no concern, if not outrage, over the manner in which
ICC has handled not just the Kenyan, but all cases before it. All the cases
currently before it arise from Africa. Yet Africa is not the only continent
where international crimes are being committed. Out of over 30 cases before the
court, NONE relates to a situation outside Africa. All the people indicted
before that court, ever since its founding have been Africans. Every plea we
have made to be heard before that court has landed upon deaf ears.
When Your Excellencies’ resolution was
communicated to the Court through a letter to its president, it was dismissed
as not being properly before the Court and therefore ineligible for
consideration. When a civil society organization wrote a letter bearing
sensational and prejudicial fabrications, the Court took urgent and substantial
decisions based on it.
Before the ICC, African sovereign
nations’ resolutions are NOTHING compared with the opinions of civil society
activists. The AU is the bastion of African sovereignty, and the vanguard of
our unity. Yet the ICC deems it altogether unworthy of the minutest
consideration. Presidents Kikwete, Museveni, Jonathan and Zuma have pronounced
themselves on the court’s insensitivity, arrogance and disrespect.
Leaders in my country have escalated
their anxiety to the national Parliament, where a legislative process to
withdraw altogether from the Rome Treaty is under consideration. As I said, it
would not be right to ignore the fact that concern over the conduct of the ICC
is strong and widespread. There is very little that remains for me to say about
the slights that the ICC continues to visit upon the nations and people of
Africa. We want to believe in due process before the ICC, but where is it being
demonstrated? We want to see the ICC as fair and even-handed throughout the
world, but what can we do when everyone but Africa is exempt from
accountability?
We would love nothing more than to have
an international forum for justice and accountability, but what choice do we
have when we get only bias and race-hunting at the ICC? Isn’t respect part of
justice? Aren’t our sovereign institutions worthy of deference within the
framework of international law? If so, what justice can be rendered by a court
which disregards our views? Our mandate is clear: sovereignty and unity.
This is the forum for us to unite and
categorically vindicate our sovereignty. Excellencies, I turn to you trusting
that we will be faithful to our charge, to each other, and to our people. I
have utmost confidence that this Assembly’s voice will be clear to the entire
world. Like other African countries, Kenya did not achieve its independence with
ease. Blood was shed for it.
Your Excellencies, I thank you. God
Bless you. God Bless Africa.
No comments:
Post a Comment